Product category:
Engineering Education, Resources and Standards
News Release from: BSEF | Subject: Flame retardant study
Edited by the Engineeringtalk Editorial
Team on 30 June 2006
Flame retardant chemicals save lives and
money
A recent study by the Swedish National Testing and Research Institute has produced a model which provides a complete analysis of all costs and benefits to society due to environmental restrictions.
How do we weigh personal safety against environmental standards? A recent study by the Swedish National Testing and Research Institute (SP), in cooperation with the Risk Assessment Institute at Utrecht University, has produced a model which provides a complete analysis of all costs and benefits to society due to environmental restrictions All environmental legislation leads to costs and benefits
This article was originally published on Engineeringtalk on 10 Nov 2004 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
Capex in power industry continues to grow
Worldwide capital and operational expenditures for plants in the electric power industry, which totalled more than $374 billion in 2003, will exceed $453 billion by the end of 2008.
More girls participate in engineering training
TTE Management and Technical Training has reported a growing trend in the number of girls in engineering.
This new model developed by SP provides the ability to accurately weight the risks and benefits of various environmental actions, offering a mechanism to ensure that regulatory decisions are based soundly in science.
The model has initially been used to test flame retardant chemicals.
"There are many personal opinions in the environmental debate," says Margaret Simonson, researcher at SP.
"Although we must have high ambitions in our environmental work, we have to base this work on scientific facts".
"In our study, we demonstrate that some flame retardants have a legitimate place in society, even when evaluated in regard to sustainable development." SP's study aims at quantifying the gains from using flame retardants in TVs.
Some authorities, such as Sweden, are very critical of flame retardants, but at the same time face the problem that TV fires are a fairly common occurrence.
In the EU each year there are about 20,000 TV fires, causing at least 160 deaths and 2,000 serious injuries.
"If we apply the precautionary principle, there ought to be high requirements for fire safety in plastic covers of TVs".
"This is not the case today in all markets," says Simonson.
SP bases part of its study on the environmental risk assessment that the EU has carried out for the most common flame retardant, DecaBDE.
According to this research, DecaBDE fulfils very high environmental requirements.
The study demonstrates that by using this flame retardant, gains of between 520 and 1,100 million Euros (650 million to 1.3 billion USD) per year for the entire EU area could be achieved, mainly through saved health care costs and costs relating to damaged property.
The costs for industry to introduce flame retardants and to take care of waste have been taken into account.
"The great benefit of flame retardants is, of course, the saving of lives and human health," says Margaret Simonson.
• BSEF: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Engineeringtalk email newsletter
• Engineeringtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
