Product category:
Fluid, thermal, noise and vibration analysis software
News Release from: Flomerics
Edited by the Engineeringtalk Editorial
Team on 25 April 2007
Computational fluid dynamics survey
released
A Flomerics survey has shown that although the vast majority (75%) of mechanical designers have heard of CFD, an even bigger majority (80%) do not use CFD today.
Flomerics has released the results of a recent survey investigating the opinions of mechanical design engineers regarding computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis The survey was promoted through a global internet forum for mechanical designers that is independent of any particular software vendor
The survey shows that although the vast majority (75%) of mechanical designers have heard of CFD, an even bigger majority (80%) do not use CFD today.
"This survey gives a clear message to CFD software vendors that we need to do more to embed our software in the mainstream mechanical design environment, and make it quick and easy to use", said Dr Mike Reynell, Director of Marketing for Flomerics.
"This survey is very encouraging because it indicates that the use of CFD can and will spread rapidly amongst general mechanical designers in the future".
The most common reason given why relatively few mechanical design engineers are using CFD was that most mechanical design engineers don't have the necessary expertise and knowledge to use a CFD code.
The second most common reason was that most mechanical design engineers are not aware of what CFD can do for them.
When asked about the most important benefits that CFD simulation brings (or could bring) to their company, 61% selected improving product performance and functionality, 59% selected reducing prototyping and testing costs, and 57% selected reducing the risk of design mistakes.
Surprisingly, only 43% identified reducing design time as a key benefit.
When asked which CFD application areas were most relevant to their jobs, 37% chose pumps, valves and hydraulic systems, 25% chose electronics cooling, 23% chose engine design, and 22% chose external airflow around cars, vehicles, and aircraft.
just 5% of respondents chose external airflow around buildings".
Flomerics is contributing to the wider use of CFD among design engineers by developing its EFD product line specifically for busy mechanical designers with limited time for CFD analysis.
EFD interacts directly with the native 3D CAD geometry at the heart of the mechanical design process, while the user operates the CFD software inside their familiar MCAD environment.
The EFD software family includes EFD.Pro - a fully embedded CFD solution within the Pro/Engineer environment; EFD.V5, - a fully embedded CFD solution within the Catia V5 environment, and EFD.Lab - a general-purpose fluid analysis tool that includes a built-in solid modeler and works with Autodesk Inventor, UGS NX and Solid Edge.
The EFD software requires no translation or copies of data, so the solid model maintains intelligence such as assembly hierarchy, design constraints, and features.
EFD makes it easy to perform flow simulation because it analyses the geometry, calculates the fluid spaces and generates the computational grid automatically.
Of the 1444 responses received, 53.6% were mechanical design engineers, 12.6% were mechanical design managers or technical directors, 8.5% were project managers or product managers, and 25.3% have other titles.
The breakdown of respondents by industry was automotive (28.9%), aerospace and defence (21.7%), consulting (15.5%), electronics and consumer appliances (13.7%), education (10.4%), medical (9.8%), computers (8.3%), construction/heating ventilation air conditioning (HVAC) (8.3%), power generation (7%), energy (6.7%), telecommunications/networks (5.1%), chemical/pharmaceutical (3.3%), and other (29.4%). Request free introductory details about products from Flomerics ...
• Flomerics: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Engineeringtalk email newsletter
• Engineeringtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
