Product category:
Design and Development Consultancy
News Release from: Laidler Associates
Edited by the Engineeringtalk Editorial
Team on 11 July 2003
No escape from EMC regulations
The issue of compliance with the EMC Directive when CE marking a machine has always been a grey area.
Laidler Associates recently contacted the HSE to gain advice regarding compliance with the EMC Directive when CE marking a machine A client had raised the issue of whether EMC testing was necessary, as the company had received conflicting advice from a fellow consultancy
This article was originally published on Engineeringtalk on 24 Apr 2002 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
Interactive workshops tackle machinery safety
Four of the leading suppliers of machine safety equipment have joined together to present a series of interactive machine safety workshops in the UK throughout 2002.
Risk management for mobile work equipment
Laidler Associates has launched a module for its Risk Management software system covering Part III of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER): Mobile Work Equipment.
The issue of compliance with the EMC Directive when CE marking a machine has always been a grey area.
However, a recent statement from the HSE's Electrical and Control Systems Unit clarifies the matter.
"In most situations, it would be necessary to undertake testing as part of compliance with the Machinery Directive, and hence the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations".
The HSE point of view relates to Section 6 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 which places duties on manufacturers etc regarding articles for use at work, including: "The duty to carry out such testing and examination as may be necessary to ensure that the article is so designed and constructed that it will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be safe and without risks to health".
The HSE feels that testing would only be considered not "reasonably practicable" if the cost for testing were "grossly disproportionate" to the reduction in risk.
"Laidler Associates have always prided themselves on giving the best and most correct advice possible", said Paul Laidler, Managing Director of Laidler Associates.
"This matter raises again the issue of the competence of consultants.
If a company is using a consultant, are they getting the best advice or the best cost? Competence isn't necessarily expensive, but a lack of competence could be.
As the saying goes, 'If you think health and safety is expensive, wait until you have an accident'". Request free introductory details about products from Laidler Associates ...
• Laidler Associates: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Engineeringtalk email newsletter
• Engineeringtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
